A few more Rare Play Interpretations . . .

By Ray Dunlap

Q – RP18, Result 2: Punter slips in act of punting, dribbles punt which rolls dead 5 yds behind line.

A – This is actually credited as one punt for -5 yards.  This happened to Sean Landetta of the Giants in a playoff game in 1985!


Q – RP 18, Result 10: Snap sails over punter’s head, he recovers ball for 36 yd loss.

A – Score this as one rushing attempt by the punter for zero yards.  The center actually gets charged with a fumble and all other yardage is incidental.


Q – RP19, Result 2: Punter drops snap, then tries to kick ball on the run, he misses it completely, recovered by d1 15 yds behind line.

A – This is a fumble.  The punter gets charged with one run for zero yards.  All other yardage is incidental.


Q – RP 19, Result 11: Blocked punt rebounds to punter, who gains 9 yds.

A – When a punt or a field goal attempt is blocked and recovered by the offensive team behind the line of scrimmage, any running advance is treated as miscellaneous yardage, not rushing yardage.


Q – RP 19, Result 12: High, wobbling punt sails out of bounds 7 yds behind line.

A – This is scored as one punt for -7 yards.


Q – RP20, Result 5: Punt is partially blocked and rolls dead 12 yds beyond line.

A – If a “blocked” kick crosses the original line of scrimmage, it is not scored as a blocked kick.  In this case, this would be scored as one punt for 12 yards.


Some Thoughts on “Home Field Advantage”

By Ray Dunlap

Ever since this post appeared here, I’ve been thinking about “Home Field Advantage.”  It is a real phenomenon and would be fairly easy to account for in APBA.  Initially, I thought it might be interesting to see who runs the ball better at home or who throws it better . . . but, I quickly decided that there really is only one statistic that truly measures “Home Field Advantage,” and that’s wins and losses.

Take the Seattle Seahawks for example.  It is not a stretch to say that they are a much tougher opponent at home than they are on the road.  This is borne out based on the frenzied fans – their proverbial “12th Man” . . . but, it is also statistically obvious by their home record.  In 2016 they were 7-1 in Seattle and 3-4-1 on the road.

Atlanta, meanwhile, was 5-3 at home, certainly a good mark, but they were 6-2 on the road.  So, not only should we look at a team like Seattle and give them some kind of a leg-up when they’re playing at CenturyLink Field, but the Falcons, likewise should be given some kind of consideration whey they’re playing on the road, because they were true “Road-Warriors” last season.

So, how?

This is where it gets a little challenging.  How do you reward the team with the advantage, make it meaningful . . . but not too much so as to awkwardly skew the results?

The best I’ve ever seen at addressing these kinds of statistical nuances is Mark Zarb.  A close second is our host, Greg Barath.  They both understand how to effectively and accurately assign just the right amount of “plusses” and “minuses” to the formula to create a balanced rewards system, and I would love to hear their take on this concept.

In the meantime, I will be testing a couple of ideas myself that I will share here in a few days.

But, what about draft leagues that don’t use stock teams?

There should be a rewards system created because we make such a big deal out of having “Home Field Advantage” in the playoffs.  But, if you play the APBA game right out of the box, there is no accommodation for the team that finishes in a draft league with the best record . . . and, maybe there should be.

So, I would love to hear any ideas you may have on how this might work in a replay using stock teams (like Atlanta and Seattle), but, also, how you might be able to give those teams with the best records in a draft league a similar advantage in their playoffs.